Skip to main content
Back to projects

VOUCH

Making invisible care work visible, portable and trusted

The problem
Caregivers carry essential work that leaves no record — so trust restarts from zero with every new family they work for.
My role
Product Designer · UX Researcher
Field research → System design · Awarded Best Technical Depth, Hackathon 7.0
Focus
Human-Centered ResearchInvisible LabourCaregiver JourneyService & Product Thinking
The impact
A portable, caregiver-owned trust framework
Awarded Best Technical Depth, Hackathon 7.0

Why this project matters

  1. 01 · The challenge

    Care work is essential, constant and completely undocumented.

  2. 02 · The signal

    Field research with caregivers and employers showed trust being rebuilt from scratch in every relationship.

  3. 03 · The response

    Designed a caregiver-owned identity where work history and community validation travel with the person.

  4. 04 · The impact

    Invisible labour becomes a verifiable, dignified economic identity — recognised with Best Technical Depth.

VOUCH project showcase — the Vouch logo and tagline beside a smartphone showing the app splash screen, with floating worker-ID and endorsement screens, the SOS wristband and the project poster layered behind.
00Overview

Who is carrying the invisible load?

VOUCH gives caregivers a way to make their work visible, build trust, and access better opportunities — converting informal, unrecognised care work into a verifiable, dignified identity.

The project was awarded Best Technical Depth at Hackathon 7.0.

01Context

What that experience actually looks like

Caregiving and domestic work is essential yet invisible. It happens inside homes, is arranged through word of mouth, and leaves nothing behind: no history, no reference that travels, no proof of reliability.

  • No portable record of work history or reliability
  • Trust is rebuilt from zero with every new relationship
  • Recognition and opportunity stay locked to word-of-mouth
Caregiver workflow
Add the day-in-the-life workflow or field research artifact
02Tension

Trust exists, but it cannot travel

Caregivers were trusted deeply — by one family at a time. That trust was real, hard-earned and completely non-transferable, so years of reliable work produced no advantage in the next negotiation.

User evidence
Add a caregiver quote or field observation about starting over
03Insight

What field research revealed

Field research with caregivers and the families who employ them showed how trust is actually established, signalled and lost in care relationships — and where the system fails the person doing the work.

  • Visibility is the foundation of opportunity
  • Trust must be portable to be valuable
  • Dignity and safety are design requirements, not extras
  • Community validation carries more weight than abstract ratings
Journey map
Add the caregiver journey from finding work to being trusted
Insight map
Add the opportunity areas identified from research
04Direction

Where the opportunity was, and what I decided

VOUCH layers identity, work history, trust signals and community validation into a single dignified profile — designed so recognition accrues to the caregiver and travels with them.

  1. What I saw

    Every new placement began with the caregiver proving themselves from zero.

  2. What it meant

    Trust was being stored by employers, not by the person who earned it.

  3. What I changed

    Made the trust profile caregiver-owned and portable across relationships.

  4. Why

    If recognition does not travel with the worker, the system keeps re-extracting the same proof.

  5. What happened

    Work history becomes an asset the caregiver carries into every new opportunity.

  1. What I saw

    Caregivers were wary of platforms that expose their movements and personal details.

  2. What it meant

    Visibility without control becomes surveillance rather than recognition.

  3. What I changed

    Built privacy and safety guardrails into what visibility means, with community validation as the primary trust signal.

  4. Why

    Care work is legible enough through community endorsement; monitoring the worker is not required to establish trust.

  5. What happened

    A trust model that increases opportunity without increasing exposure.

05Making

How the service takes shape

The flow moves from identity, to work record, to community validation, to opportunity — with safety built in as a first-class touchpoint rather than a setting.

Service blueprint
Add the blueprint linking caregiver, employer and community touchpoints
Prototype
Add the identity, verification and validation flows
06Proof

Pressure-testing dignity and safety

Trust and visibility flows were checked against caregivers' real safety and dignity needs from field research. The trust model was refined to centre community validation over abstract ratings, and to make work history portable across relationships rather than locked to one employer.

Validation
Add testing sessions, feedback or judging evidence
07Impact

What changed

Award
Best Technical Depth, Hackathon 7.0
Portable
Caregiver-owned trust
Visibility
For invisible work

What changed

Trust stopped belonging to the employer and started belonging to the caregiver. Work history, verification and community validation became one portable record the caregiver carries into every new relationship.

What I learned

  • The hardest problems are often invisible: nobody described 'no portable trust' — they described starting over.
  • Visibility is not automatically good; who benefits from it has to be a deliberate design decision.
  • Community validation carries more weight than abstract ratings in relationships built on care.

What I would do next

  • Test the verification flow with caregivers who have low digital confidence.
  • Map the employer side of the service blueprint in equal depth.

Next project

Decoded DFC

Redesigning learning momentum for working professionals

View case study